<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Technical Stuff (Git/SVN/Concerto)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brian.brispace.net/2009/07/19/technical-stuff-gitsvnconcerto/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brian.brispace.net/2009/07/19/technical-stuff-gitsvnconcerto/</link>
	<description>Where I don&#039;t care what others think</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 12:57:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Armenia</title>
		<link>http://brian.brispace.net/2009/07/19/technical-stuff-gitsvnconcerto/comment-page-1/#comment-4884</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Armenia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 16:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brian.brispace.net/?p=433#comment-4884</guid>
		<description>For what it&#039;s worth, one of the most interesting bits I&#039;ve found about Git&#039;s &quot;offline&quot; support is the ability to have local branches. This works really well for testing out a quick change without necessarily influencing the central repository. Incidentally, you can accomplish something similar with &quot;git reset&quot;, but I think this is a very bad idea if you&#039;ve already pushed the changes. In git, I do more commits, because I don&#039;t worry as much about committing code that hasn&#039;t been tested.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For what it&#8217;s worth, one of the most interesting bits I&#8217;ve found about Git&#8217;s &#8220;offline&#8221; support is the ability to have local branches. This works really well for testing out a quick change without necessarily influencing the central repository. Incidentally, you can accomplish something similar with &#8220;git reset&#8221;, but I think this is a very bad idea if you&#8217;ve already pushed the changes. In git, I do more commits, because I don&#8217;t worry as much about committing code that hasn&#8217;t been tested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

